Apples Move to Share Health Care Records Is a Game-Changer

In late January, Apple previewed an iOS feature that would allow consumers to access their electronic health records on their telephones. Skeptics said the move was a decade too late given a similar( and failed) try from Google. Optimists argued that Apple was capable of translating health data into something meaningful for consumers.



Aneesh Chopra( @aneeshchopra) is chairperson of CareJourney and former chief technology officer of the United States. Shafiq Rab( @cioshafiq) is senior vice president and chief information officer of the Rush University Medical Center.

But the bulletin portends great things for consumers and the app developers seeking to serve them, from our perspectives as the former US chief technology officer under President Obama, and as an early adopter of the Apple service as Rush University Medical Center’s chief knowledge policeman. That’s because Apple has committed to an open API for health care records–specifically, the Argonaut Project specification of the HL7 Fast Health Interoperability Resources–so your doctor or hospital can participate with little extra effort.

This move is a game-changer for three reasons: It affirms there is one common path to open up electronic health records data for developers so they can focus on revelling customers rather than chasing records. It encourages other platform companies to build on that track, rather than seek proprietary systems. And it ensures that the tempo of progress will speed up as healthcare delivery systems respond to the aggregate demand of potentially billions of iPhone users around the world.

Understanding the promise of this announcement requires a bit of historical context. In the aftermath of the 2008 economic crisis, President Obama signed into statute the Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which included more than $37 billion for investing in the adoption and use of electronic health records by doctors and hospitals. Folded away in that program was a comparably modest $15 million investment in research and developing to bring to life a eyesight of applications inspired by Apple’s App Store. That R& D funding contributed to the development of the open API standard that Apple now requires of providers wishing to build the feature available to their patients.

Spurred by financial incentives in the Recovery Act, the Affordable Care Act and in 2015, the bipartisan Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, providers are implementing health IT systems the hell is certified to meet certain government requirements.

One such mandatory is to allow patients the ability to connect any application of their choice, like Apple Health, to a portion of their records via an API. However, the government left chamber for representatives of the private sector to build consensus on how to achieve this requirement, which resulted in the Argonaut Project specification. Apple’s decision to require that open API standard lessens the likelihood that health IT developers will adopt a proprietary system.

Better still, once a provider’s electronic health records system delivers health data in accordance with the standard, that same connection will be available to any app developer offering customer applications, including those to construct the Android ecosystem, or vying to serve the highly anticipated Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, and Berkshire Hathaway employee health joint undertaking. Imagine if Apple had instead introduced a proprietary system that didn’t allow challengers to access data in the same manner from the participating providers.

Naysayers point out the fact that Apple is currently displaying only a sliver of a consumer’s entire electronic health record. That is true-life, but it’s largely on account of the limited information available via the open API standard. As with all standards endeavours, the FHIR API will add more content, like scheduling slots and clinical notes, over day. Some of that the project works will be motivated by proposed federal government voluntary framework to expand the types of data that must be shared over period by certified systems, as noted in this draft approach out for public comment.

Imagine if Apple further opens up Apple Health so it no longer serves as the destination, but a conduit for a patient’s longitudinal health record to a developing marketplace of applications that can help guide customers through decisions to better manage their health.

Thankfully, “consumers interests” data-sharing movement–placing the longitudinal health record in the hands of individual patients and its implementation they trust–is taking hold, albeit softly. In simply the past few weeks, a number of health systems that were initially slow to turn on the required APIs suddenly procured the motivation to meet Apple’s requirement.

When we look back a decade from now to render decision, it will be the impact Apple Health has had in changing the default setting in the area of health information sharing–from closed to open.

WIRED Opinion writes parts written by outside contributors and represents a wide range of viewpoints. Read more sentiments here.

More on Health Care

Health care is hemorrhaging data. AI is here to assist

What happens when we let tech care for our aging mothers

With AI, your Apple Watch could help flag diabetes

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Trump polls rich friends on gun control, comes out in favor of background check bill

Donald Trump Is Ranked Among The Worst Ever US Presidents & It’s Truly Laughable